A recent report from the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG) has raised alarms over the health risks associated with the Army’s Future Soldier Preparatory Course (FSPC), citing inadequate medical oversight and potential dangers to recruits. The report, released in mid-February, highlights critical gaps in medical services and regulatory compliance, particularly within the fitness component known as the Assessment of Recruit Motivation and Strength (ARMS) 2.0 Pilot Program.
The FSPC, overseen by the Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), was created to help individuals who do not initially meet Army enlistment standards. The fitness component allows recruits to enter with a body fat percentage exceeding standard limits by up to 8%, with the goal of preparing them for Basic Combat Training. However, the report details systemic medical shortcomings that place trainees at risk of adverse health effects, including metabolic and cardiovascular concerns.
Key Findings
Lack of Medical Oversight: At the Army Training Center and Fort Jackson (ATC&FJ), recruits did not consistently receive required medical services such as metabolic and cardiovascular screenings, weekly assessments by a registered dietitian, or medical clearance before progressing to basic training.
Medical Staffing Shortages: Despite regulations recommending one dietitian per 100 trainees, only one dietitian was assigned to support 400-500 trainees. The report states this deficiency directly impacted the availability of necessary medical assessments.
Excessive Body Fat Allowances: The report found that 14% of the 1,181 trainees in the ARMS 2.0 pilot program between February and May 2024 exceeded the authorized 8% body fat limit, with some reaching as high as 19%. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) (ASA[M&RA]) had not authorized waivers for this deviation.
Health Risks Identified: Internal communications from the TRADOC Command Surgeon and the ATC&FJ Division Medical Director acknowledged increased health risks for trainees, including potential fatalities, due to rapid weight loss attempts.
Army Response and Unresolved Recommendations
TRADOC leadership and the ASA(M&RA) disputed several findings, arguing that trainees did receive appropriate medical evaluations and that internal discussions did not explicitly acknowledge a risk of death. However, the DoD OIG report counters that TRADOC failed to provide documentation to support these claims.
The report makes multiple recommendations, including a formal audit of how unqualified trainees entered the program, the implementation of stricter medical screening protocols, and a review of medical resource deficiencies. While the Army has agreed to an audit, other recommendations remain unresolved as TRADOC maintains that existing policies are sufficient.
Looking Ahead
The DoD OIG has requested a response from the Army within 30 days outlining corrective actions. Meanwhile, concerns persist over the safety of recruits participating in the FSPC, with watchdog groups calling for urgent reforms to ensure medical readiness and compliance with established health standards.
As the Army continues to face recruitment challenges, balancing accessibility with the health and safety of incoming soldiers remains a pressing issue. Whether the recommendations from the Inspector General’s report will lead to substantial changes remains to be seen.
The full report can be read here.
© 2025 The Salty Soldier. All rights reserved.
The content of this webpage may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of TheSaltySoldier.com.
